TheLiberalForums.com Logo.
Click here to view our online shop!

    SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:52 pm
TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index
View unanswered posts

Liberal of the Month
Barack Obama
Barack Obama

Sponsors

Submitted Articles
What is a Liberal?
How Liberalism evolved?

 Search 


RomeForums.com Logo

HippieForums.com Logo

TheXboxBoys.com Logo

Sedo - Buy and Sell Domain Names and Websites etracker® web controlling instead of log file analysis
What if Al Gore were elected president?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index -> Iraq war
Author Message
dzwonfv
Congressional Page


Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 13

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:51 am    Post subject: What if Al Gore were elected president? Reply with quote

Can anyone imagine what America would have been like if Al Gore were elected president?
To begin with, with what we know now, there would not have been a 9/11.
If you don?t believe that, I will guarantee you, we would not be in Iraq.
Katrina would have been a whole lot easier on the people devastated by it.
The fight on terrorism would be proceeding to an eventual close, with an approach of finding its root causes, and correcting them.
Our surplus would have increased, or went to promoting the general welfare; it would have gone to the people who needed it.
The economy would have created many millions of jobs, and the middle and low income workers would have decreased the gap between them and the rich.
All countries would have respected us and we would all be working for the common well being of the world and the global economy.
All our freedoms would have been preserved and we would be proud of America.
Back to top
CardSleuth
Congressional Page


Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think this person is an example of a "moonbat".
Back to top
bangfor1
Mayor's Aide


Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 88

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:24 pm    Post subject: I agree with you Reply with quote

What you're saying makes sense simply because Al Gore would have not looked toward the ME oil, because he isn't or wasn't an oil businessman. If you take George Bush, his preoccupation was oil even before he became president, and I had seen some where a proof that their group had lost something substantial before he became president, and he was obviously out to avenge that. So, in a sense it's possible to say that he has used the American public as well as his office to save the ME oil from being controlled by someone like Sadaam, but the catch is he isn't the only beneficiary. The American public comes first then the globe, which would make you say the clique was ahead of the American public simply because they insiders in the oil world.
Back to top
julian4239
Mayor


Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 211

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 8:03 pm    Post subject: Re: I agree with you Reply with quote

bangfor1 wrote:
What you're saying makes sense simply because Al Gore would have not looked toward the ME oil, because he isn't or wasn't an oil businessman. If you take George Bush, his preoccupation was oil even before he became president, and I had seen some where a proof that their group had lost something substantial before he became president, and he was obviously out to avenge that. So, in a sense it's possible to say that he has used the American public as well as his office to save the ME oil from being controlled by someone like Sadaam, but the catch is he isn't the only beneficiary. The American public comes first then the globe, which would make you say the clique was ahead of the American public simply because they insiders in the oil world.


So you're saying that this whole thing is because of revenge for oil?

How can he be an "oilman" if he divested himself a while ago?

Again, this war has nothing to do with Bush's interest in OIL. There's no benefit that he would get by a war in Iraq.
Back to top
bangfor1
Mayor's Aide


Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 88

PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:45 pm    Post subject: where are you coming from? Reply with quote

It depends on where you're coming from, because your view is exactly the same as mainstream media, but there are sources that are airing dirty laundry about him, and if you encounter one of those you'll exactly know who the Bush family are including Chenney. No big deal though, because almost everyone knows that George Bush is crazed because of oil.
Back to top
Coda1108
Mayor's Aide


Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Location: PA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmmm... If Al Gore had been elected President.... I think I wouldn't be reading this thread, because I would have been forced to work a few more jobs so as to cover the inflated costs of health care which I could only find outside of the National Healthcare System because I'm not willing to wait months for a routine medical test....

... oh wait, that would be if John Kerry had been elected President....

.... oh wait, that's the same thing....

... okay, my first paragraph still stands Smile
Back to top
USA All The Way
Congressional Page


Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lol, al gore!! what a ham bone. This guy lives in his own lil world. He needs to get on his knees and thank God for a life . If he had won the presidency do you know we would be rite in the garbage can about now. Hes a klinton luvr pureand simple.
Back to top
marvinbighead
Congressional Page


Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You could be right,but what realy gets me, is if bush was named gore and vise versa,that would have tipped it to the liberals.An ignorant democracy is dangerous...Vote for bush and get a load of gore,vote for gore and get a load of bushes.
Back to top
deportliberals
Congressman


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

marvinbighead wrote:
You could be right,but what realy gets me, is if bush was named gore and vise versa,that would have tipped it to the liberals.


Please tell me that you have enough mental capacity about yourself to understand that your above suggestion about Bush & Gore changing names would have produced the same results...a conservative(not a liberal) would still be in the white house as president.

The nation wanted a person with conservative credentials in the white house...not a lying liberal wuss who had just spent eight years as Clinton's number two man. The nation had already thrown out the lib democrats in both houses of congress and had given the majority this nation's governorships to the republicans.

A Big liberal ma-ma's boy was last thing the nation wanted in the whitehouse.
If that big candyass would've been our president on 9-11, there would have been many more huge u.s. buildings taken out after 9-11...Osama would have had a field day killing americans in our schools, our malls, our airports, on our trains, etc...Al Gore and the lib democrats would just sit by jackin' their jaws just like Bill Clilnton did when Osama hit the twin towers in '93, bombed our embassy in Africa and killed 17 navy sailiers in Sudan. Clinton did NOTHING!!! Al-dumbass-Gore would have done NOTHING!!! You liberals have a 40-year track record of being cowards, yellowbellies, surrenderers, and all our enemies know this and take advantage of this country everytime you liberal feel-good weenies lie your way into power.
Back to top
Anonymous Mind
Mayor's Aide


Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 56
Location: US

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

9/11 would have still happened regardless of who was president. They tried the car bomb under the world trade center in '91, and neither al gore nor bush were president.
Al Gore is an enviromentalist, and if he pulled out of Iraq like the dems want to, the terroist attaks would increase, Al Qaude and other anti-UN groups would gain more confidence and attak the UN more.
Everything the US has accomplished in Iraq woud be wasted.

And al gore would preach to us about global warming.
Bush was the best candidate of the Bush-Al Gore election, and the 2004 election after that.
Back to top
THR
Congressional Page


Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 23
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If Al Gore were elected President we would never have become an occupying country......face it people that's what we are...we have invaded Iraq and we need to get our troops out of Iraq asap! We should be going after Osama Bin Laden last I heard he was in Afghanistan not Iraq! I like the fact that we live in a good country but I feel that Dubya' has taken it upon our shoulders to police the world. We need to get out this is not our country..i wonder how anyone of you would feel if North Korea came in and invaded our country.....Imo they have just as much a right as we did when we invaded Iraq! Cool
Back to top
deportliberals
Congressman


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

THR wrote:
If Al Gore were elected President we would never have become an occupying country.


O.K...name one country that the U.S. occupies? Do you even understand what the word "occupies" means in a geo-political sense??? Do you even understand what the word "occupies" means in a military sense.?

You are an outright, blatant liar to claim that this country occupies any other nation on this planet. Why don't you go look up the word "ally." The constitutionally elected iraqi president was on capitol hill just a month ago asking the liberal controlled congress to NOT WITHDRAW U.S.TROOPS.

Does that sound like a country that is being occupied, dumbass???????????

The iraqis and the U.S. are fighting side-by-side daily as allies against the terrorists and insurgents. What f--king part of that reality don't you understand???????????????? Allies do NOT occupy each other's countries....what a dumbass!!!!!!!!!!!
Back to top
THR
Congressional Page


Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 23
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

deportliberals wrote:
THR wrote:
If Al Gore were elected President we would never have become an occupying country.


O.K...name one country that the U.S. occupies? Do you even understand what the word "occupies" means in a geo-political sense??? Do you even understand what the word "occupies" means in a military sense.?

You are an outright, blatant liar to claim that this country occupies any other nation on this planet. Why don't you go look up the word "ally." The constitutionally elected iraqi president was on capitol hill just a month ago asking the liberal controlled congress to NOT WITHDRAW U.S.TROOPS.

Does that sound like a country that is being occupied, dumbass???????????

The iraqis and the U.S. are fighting side-by-side daily as allies against the terrorists and insurgents. What f--king part of that reality don't you understand???????????????? Allies do NOT occupy each other's countries....what a dumbass!!!!!!!!!!!


When we first invaded Iraq we were an occupying country.....I don't think Saddam invited us in....so who is the dumb ass? I know he was an evil man but are plenty of other leaders of different country's are we going to invade them as well dumb ass????????????
Back to top
Beststash
Mayor's Aide


Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

deportliberals wrote:
THR wrote:
If Al Gore were elected President we would never have become an occupying country.


O.K...name one country that the U.S. occupies? Do you even understand what the word "occupies" means in a geo-political sense??? Do you even understand what the word "occupies" means in a military sense.?

You are an outright, blatant liar to claim that this country occupies any other nation on this planet. Why don't you go look up the word "ally." The constitutionally elected iraqi president was on capitol hill just a month ago asking the liberal controlled congress to NOT WITHDRAW U.S.TROOPS.

Does that sound like a country that is being occupied, dumbass???????????

The iraqis and the U.S. are fighting side-by-side daily as allies against the terrorists and insurgents. What f--king part of that reality don't you understand???????????????? Allies do NOT occupy each other's countries....what a dumbass!!!!!!!!!!!


What planet are you living on?? If you haven't figured out that this country was duped by "W" yet - will you ever figure it out.

Yes we are an occupying country and one that would love to get out of there with a little bit of dignity but you can rest assured that these morons that we have in the WH are not going to admit total failure and will leave this mess for someone else to clean up. I just hope that the voters hold al of these GOP Senators and Reps accountable for their complicity with Bush. I think they should all be ashamed for screwing this country up almost beyond recognition in just a short 6+ years.

Peace
Back to top
deportliberals
Congressman


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 8:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

THR wrote:

When we first invaded Iraq we were an occupying country.....I don't think Saddam invited us in....so who is the dumb ass?



That is NOT what you said, turdknocker!!! You said WE ARE AN OCCUPYING COUNTRY....NEED TO BRING OUR TROOPS HOME. My response to that was that we are NOT an occupying country...AND WE ARE NOT!!! To say that we ARE makes you an outright liar, legally and morally!!!!

You didn't say a damn word about the early phases of "Operations Iraqi Freedom" where we had just conquered the iraqi forces and removed Saddam Huessin. If you want to say that we WERE an occupying country that would be accurate. BUT WE ARE NOT an occupying county...that's a frickin' lie, period!!!!
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index -> Iraq war All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Sponsors
Political News
RSS to JavaScript


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group