TheLiberalForums.com Logo.
Click here to view our online shop!

    SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:43 pm
TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index
View unanswered posts

Liberal of the Month
Barack Obama
Barack Obama

Sponsors

Submitted Articles
What is a Liberal?
How Liberalism evolved?

 Search 


RomeForums.com Logo

HippieForums.com Logo

TheXboxBoys.com Logo

Sedo - Buy and Sell Domain Names and Websites etracker® web controlling instead of log file analysis
When does arguing get out of hand?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index -> Why I created the forum
Author Message
Xterminator45
Mayor's Aide


Joined: 08 Dec 2005
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:45 pm    Post subject: When does arguing get out of hand? Reply with quote

I can expect this happening at this forum and others. I was at another forum which used to hold serious discussions on politics and religion. It used to get nasty in there sometimes due to the nature of those two topics. There's always going to be opposing forces in those topics.

I think these should be some of the ground rules:

*ABSOLUTELY NO NAME CALLING(CURSING).
*NO PROFANITY.
*NO CAPS OR YELLING OR TOO MANY EXCLAMATION MARKS.
*NO PUT DOWNS OF MEMBERS.
*NO HARRASSING OVER EMAIL OR PMS.

That's all I can think of on top of my head, feel free to add more.
Back to top
Freakin
Mayor's Aide


Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 64

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
*ABSOLUTELY NO NAME CALLING(CURSING).
*NO PROFANITY.
*NO CAPS OR YELLING OR TOO MANY EXCLAMATION MARKS.
*NO PUT DOWNS OF MEMBERS.
*NO HARRASSING OVER EMAIL OR PMS.


See point #3

Laughing

I definitely agree that intelligent discussion is much more beneficial than pointless flaming.

Back to top
phil
Mayor


Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 174
Location: Seattle

PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Freakin, omg.


P Embarassed
Back to top
Pink
Congressional Page


Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok Freakin, I'm ignoring you and trying to uphold the rules listed by Xterminator45. And another one to maybe add is one our moms tried to teach us... some didn't suceed.... "if you don't have something nice to say... keep your mouth shut."
Back to top
phil
Mayor


Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 174
Location: Seattle

PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree, freakin thats sick, and this is my forum!
Back to top
Mrs Wolfie
Mayor's Aide


Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 117

PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That is wrong on so many levels- Freakin, are you a lib?
Back to top
shinningstar
Congressional Page


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I respect all your point of view. Infact, I'm not idealistic but realistic. Honestly, I hate to follow rules. It's just sometimes I don't have any choice.
Back to top
deportliberals
Congressman


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

shinningstar wrote:
Well, I respect all your point of view. Infact, I'm not idealistic but realistic. Honestly, I hate to follow rules. It's just sometimes I don't have any choice.


It is nothing but pure, raw political correctness to say that you "respect" all opinions. Opinions without facts or some basis in fact are nothing but rumors, lies or inuendos and should not command anyone's respect.

Respect is something that must be "earned" and this "fact" has been lost on our politically correct asinine culture. You should NOT respect all opinions unless you want to place yourself in the lowly position of respecting "lies, rumors, gossip and jabber-jaw bullsh*t!!!

Save your "respect" for those opinions that are truly worthy of respect...be very selective with your respect...opinions that are built upon truths, facts, research and reasoned assessments are the earners of respect. Everything else is pure mindless crap and totally worthless.
Back to top
Pibber
Congressional Page


Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 27
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

deportliberals wrote:
shinningstar wrote:
Well, I respect all your point of view. Infact, I'm not idealistic but realistic. Honestly, I hate to follow rules. It's just sometimes I don't have any choice.


It is nothing but pure, raw political correctness to say that you "respect" all opinions. Opinions without facts or some basis in fact are nothing but rumors, lies or inuendos and should not command anyone's respect.

Respect is something that must be "earned" and this "fact" has been lost on our politically correct asinine culture. You should NOT respect all opinions unless you want to place yourself in the lowly position of respecting "lies, rumors, gossip and jabber-jaw bullsh*t!!!

Save your "respect" for those opinions that are truly worthy of respect...be very selective with your respect...opinions that are built upon truths, facts, research and reasoned assessments are the earners of respect. Everything else is pure mindless crap and totally worthless.

I agree, whole heartedly. I also believe that to give credence to someone's opinions simply because they hold strong beliefs is equally cowardly and craven. People have a way of interpreting "facts" to match their opinion.
Back to top
deportliberals
Congressman


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pibber wrote:

I agree, whole heartedly. I also believe that to give credence to someone's opinions simply because they hold strong beliefs is equally cowardly and craven. People have a way of interpreting "facts" to match their opinion.


Then you must also agree that a gasbag who has not posted a single fact, source, to support any of his/hers/its views yet accuses another (who do post sources, links, qotes, etc) in support of his views is nothing more than the typical uninformed lib-leftist puke whose only contribtuion to a debating website is name-calling & personal insults.
Back to top
Pibber
Congressional Page


Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 27
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

deportliberals wrote:
Pibber wrote:

I agree, whole heartedly. I also believe that to give credence to someone's opinions simply because they hold strong beliefs is equally cowardly and craven. People have a way of interpreting "facts" to match their opinion.


Then you must also agree that a gasbag who has not posted a single fact, source, to support any of his/hers/its views yet accuses another (who do post sources, links, qotes, etc) in support of his views is nothing more than the typical uninformed lib-leftist puke whose only contribtuion to a debating website is name-calling & personal insults.

Of course you would have to label and catagorize people to make your world work. And there are any number of web sites and publications designed to give credibilty to what ever pre-conceived notions you might have. So that doesn't really matter. You obviously cherry pick and mix and match your sources to fit your petty agenda. You are obviously the school yard bully here. A lot of bluster. But not much real substance. Your stuff breaks down easy. I have always welcomed the opportunity to kick the crap out of the bully. You will be hearing more from me. See ya.
Back to top
deportliberals
Congressman


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pibber wrote:

Of course you would have to label and catagorize people to make your world work.


Yes...labeling and categorizing is what the human brain does and why we have language that supports that thought process. When libs can't debate points due to their ignorance of facts and truths, you can always count on them to whine about being labeled, etc. It seems that they can't deal with the reality that most thoughts and language is nothing but a process of categorizing.

Quote:

You obviously cherry pick and mix and match your sources to fit your petty agenda.


You are hereby challenged to pick any of posts for debate on the facts!

Quote:

You are obviously the school yard bully here. A lot of bluster. But not much real substance. Your stuff breaks down easy. I have always welcomed the opportunity to kick the crap out of the bully. You will be hearing more from me. See ya.


Bring it on...little man....
Back to top
Pibber
Congressional Page


Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 27
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very sporting of you old boy. I'm sure. I gladly accept your challenge. What ever topic you like. We could talk about Iraq. But that's been over done, don't you think? Both sides on that question end up in a circular argument, leading no where. I should have a lot more to say about that one in a couple of months or so. Maybe we should start with something less emotional. You seem to have a particular interest in history and military related subjects. That works good for me. I have a passing knowlege of those subjects. I like the classics. Thucydides, Xenophon, Plutarch, Herodotus, Caesar, Tacitus, Polybius, Suetonius, Clausewitz; you get the idea. I enjoy reading about western civilization. I have only superficial knowlege of eastern culture. But we can discuss what ever. Politics, religion, history, anything.
Back to top
deportliberals
Congressman


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pibber wrote:
Very sporting of you old boy. I'm sure. I gladly accept your challenge. What ever topic you like.


Well...you've made a number of insulting posts in my thread about Abe Lincoln starting the civil war. Why don't you pick out some of my facts that you call 'spin" or have impuned and bring your facts to the table for a debate?

Quote:

We could talk about Iraq. But that's been over done, don't you think? Both sides on that question end up in a circular argument, leading no where. I should have a lot more to say about that one in a couple of months or so.


Well...it sounds like you're studying up on iraq. If you don't want to discuss iraq proper at this time, how about debating the issue of the lying liberal media and the lying liberal congress accusing Bush of lying about pre-war intel, WMDs, etc?? On second thought, since I know for a fact that you will not find a sentilla of evidence/facts to support any of the lying outrageous claims made against this president on this issue, you might want to pass on this one...nothing but lib lies, rumors and ineundos...no facts.


Quote:

Maybe we should start with something less emotional. You seem to have a particular interest in history and military related subjects. That works good for me. I have a passing knowlege of those subjects. I like the classics.


What do the classics have to do with genuine facts and accurate history??? If they were not part of the required liberal arts curriculum that was forced down the throats of many us, I would have not wasted my time reading any of those fabels & musings to earn the required 12 credit hours.
Back to top
Pibber
Congressional Page


Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 27
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

deportliberals wrote:
Pibber wrote:
Very sporting of you old boy. I'm sure. I gladly accept your challenge. What ever topic you like.


Well...you've made a number of insulting posts in my thread about Abe Lincoln starting the civil war. Why don't you pick out some of my facts that you call 'spin" or have impuned and bring your facts to the table for a debate?

Quote:

We could talk about Iraq. But that's been over done, don't you think? Both sides on that question end up in a circular argument, leading no where. I should have a lot more to say about that one in a couple of months or so.


Well...it sounds like you're studying up on iraq. If you don't want to discuss iraq proper at this time, how about debating the issue of the lying liberal media and the lying liberal congress accusing Bush of lying about pre-war intel, WMDs, etc?? On second thought, since I know for a fact that you will not find a sentilla of evidence/facts to support any of the lying outrageous claims made against this president on this issue, you might want to pass on this one...nothing but lib lies, rumors and ineundos...no facts.


Quote:

Maybe we should start with something less emotional. You seem to have a particular interest in history and military related subjects. That works good for me. I have a passing knowlege of those subjects. I like the classics.


What do the classics have to do with genuine facts and accurate history??? If they were not part of the required liberal arts curriculum that was forced down the throats of many us, I would have not wasted my time reading any of those fabels & musings to earn the required 12 credit hours.

You are apparently not well versed in military history. My mistake. Like I said; any subject you like. Although I really hope such a debate doesn't devolve into a pissing contest of conflicting statistics and psuedo-facts. I like hear people explain why they believe things. I like to explore the premise of every question. Not just accept it at face value. I hope you can debate on those terms.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index -> Why I created the forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Sponsors
Political News
RSS to JavaScript


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group