|
|
| Author |
Message |
zachary0611
Mayor's Aide
Joined: 02 Dec 2005
Posts: 52
Location: Raleigh, N.C.
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:15 pm Post subject: The Liberal Agenda |
 |
|
Heres a couple of things that i heard was the Liberal agenda
Subvert education with Humanism, PC and rewritten history.
Use Judges to bypass the Constitution.
Dumb-down the public so they will not understand their rights.
Distort the media so that their agenda is not addressed.
Support and advance whacko junk-science and social values.
Reduce the Military power and position of the USA.
Encourage the USA to become subservant to the Untied Nations.
Ignore the MexAmerica syndrome.
Attempt supression of the Judeo-Christian American social ethics.
Promote Islamic and Muslim indoctrination of children.
Portend to be for "the masses" while actually advancing their elite agenda. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Digital Portraits
Mayor's Aide
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 52
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Distort the media so their point is not addressed? Isn't that something that is already happening! Look at everything that is happening right now, in terms of media. Can you really tell me one source of news that isn't distorted |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Slick4788
Mayor's Aide
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 50
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2005 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Digital Portraits wrote: | | Distort the media so their point is not addressed? Isn't that something that is already happening! Look at everything that is happening right now, in terms of media. Can you really tell me one source of news that isn't distorted |
No he means that most of the media is conservative so their agenda is way off, and we liberals should distort it.
I however think that most of the media is liberal and democratic, so we don't have any media to distort. If you think about any journalists out there, there mostly going to be in the liberal mindset. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
miked
Mayor's Aide
Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 50
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Distort media so their agenda isn't addressed means that they have a hidden agenda that they don't want you to know and that they distort media, so their views look the best. I have heard that the Fox News channel is a whole lot better than alot of news stations out there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ritterz
Mayor's Aide
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 50
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Is all that stuff true? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xterminator45
Mayor's Aide
Joined: 08 Dec 2005
Posts: 52
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No way miked! Fox news is one horrible channel.
It's news is heavily biased and leaning towards conservative views.
I quote from an article:
"The abundance of conservatives and Republicans at Fox News Channel does not seem to be a coincidence. In 1996, Andrew Kirtzman, a respected New York City cable news reporter, was interviewed for a job with Fox and says that management wanted to know what his political affiliation was. "They were afraid I was a Democrat," he told the Village Voice (10/15/96). When Kirtzman refused to tell Fox his party ID, "all employment discussion ended," according to the Voice." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xterminator45
Mayor's Aide
Joined: 08 Dec 2005
Posts: 52
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| About the liberal agenda though. I think one of the most important things on liberals minds these days is Iraq. And how we are just there for oil. It seems that it's stuck in their minds, and they don't have much else to talk about. They're screaming right and left to get the hell out of Iraq, but doing so could be catastrophic! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Verida
Congressional Page
Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 13
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| and how do you suppose this would have any catastrophic outcome? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
James Rottnek
Mayor's Aide
Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 65
|
| Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This nation was NOT founded on Christianity! Many leaders (ie:Ben Franklin) were diests. They beleived that God made everything and stepped away. There are also numerosu faiths other than Chrsitianity here now! There is Zorastrianism! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deportliberals
Congressman
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704
|
| Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| James Rottnek wrote: | | This nation was NOT founded on Christianity! Many leaders (ie:Ben Franklin) were diests. They beleived that God made everything and stepped away. There are also numerosu faiths other than Chrsitianity here now! There is Zorastrianism! |
Another lie. This nation was founded on 100% christian faith. One of the main reasons so-called pilgrams braved the atlantic journey was RELIGIOUS FREEDOM....THEY WERE ALL CHRISTIANS or practiced a form of christianity.
There were a few foundres who toyed with dieism & athiesm, etc. but the majority believed in the christian faith. You have to look no further then the last wills and testament written by most of these men. They call on Christ, and God, the Father to have mercy upon their souls and they ask for forgiveness from almighty God. Many of these men had a healthy fear of god.
The Charters of the first 13 colonies all recognized Christ and the biblical god and the holy spirit in their founding texts. In many of the colonies, you could not hold a position of importance or an official postition unless you were a christian.
The america-hatin' liberals have done their level best to hide or re-write this history, but their efforts cannot withstand the historical facts. Anytime a liberal makes the claim that this nation(which is still more than 80% christian) was not founded upon christian principles by christians...know that you're talkin' to a serious america-hater who is willing to lie openly about raw, provable historical fact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
James Rottnek
Mayor's Aide
Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 65
|
| Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But the nation itself beleived in no interference in State and Religion.
I would also like to calrify on the "Seperation of Church and State". There is a letter from Jefferson to some Baptists, the letter basically said that only the federal governemnt was barred from interference in religious affairs and mainly that it couldn't set up a state church. States, however, were nto barred from things liek this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deportliberals
Congressman
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| James Rottnek wrote: | | But the nation itself beleived in no interference in State and Religion. |
Wrong! The original 13 colonies definitely believed that the christian religion and gov't went together. I just gave you a source above(13 original state charters) that all called on god and recognized god as the ultimiate authority.
Why don't you go read one or two of the Charters and learn!!!
| Quote: |
I would also like to calrify on the "Seperation of Church and State". There is a letter from Jefferson to some Baptists, the letter basically said that only the federal governemnt was barred from interference in religious affairs and mainly that it couldn't set up a state church. States, however, were nto barred from things liek this. |
You're talking about Jefferson's 1802 letter to the Danburry Baptist Assocation, which was a minority religion at that time. These folks were told by their state authorities that religious freedom was a privilege, not a right. Jefferson responded by saying that 1st amendment to the constitution guarantees that gov't cannot create an official religion. That's when he turned the infamous phrase about a wall of separation betwen church and state.
You are correct about the conflict of amendment 10 states' rights and amendment 1 about religious freedoms. That matter was settled years ago...federal law trumps state law on that issue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mykcob4
Mayor's Aide
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 50
Location: dallas
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:15 am Post subject: Re: The Liberal Agenda |
|
|
| zachary0611 wrote: | Heres a couple of things that i heard was the Liberal agenda
Subvert education with Humanism, PC and rewritten history.
Use Judges to bypass the Constitution.
Dumb-down the public so they will not understand their rights.
Distort the media so that their agenda is not addressed.
Support and advance whacko junk-science and social values.
Reduce the Military power and position of the USA.
Encourage the USA to become subservant to the Untied Nations.
Ignore the MexAmerica syndrome.
Attempt supression of the Judeo-Christian American social ethics.
Promote Islamic and Muslim indoctrination of children.
Portend to be for "the masses" while actually advancing their elite agenda. |
This is a lie and you are a liar! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Carson4545
Congressional Page
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Verida wrote: | | and how do you suppose this would have any catastrophic outcome? |
and also free of common sense |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Search 
Memberlist
Register
Profile 
Log in to check your private messages 
Log in 
