TheLiberalForums.com Logo.
Click here to view our online shop!

    SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
The time now is Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:34 pm
TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index
View unanswered posts

Liberal of the Month
Barack Obama
Barack Obama

Sponsors

Submitted Articles
What is a Liberal?
How Liberalism evolved?

 Search 


RomeForums.com Logo

HippieForums.com Logo

TheXboxBoys.com Logo

Sedo - Buy and Sell Domain Names and Websites etracker® web controlling instead of log file analysis
Hitler on the History Channel
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index -> History
Author Message
marvinbighead
Congressional Page


Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If hitler didnt do Barbarossa,he would have been nuked for sure.
Back to top
deportliberals
Congressman


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

marvinbighead wrote:
If hitler didnt do Barbarossa,he would have been nuked for sure.


We didn't have operating nukes until July 1945. Germany had already surrendered by then and Hilter was dead. What nukes are you talking about?
Back to top
marvinbighead
Congressional Page


Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If hitler didnt use up his troops attacking russia,(they had a signed peace pact),he then would have had massive armies standing in 1945.That is when the nukes were coming online..It stands to reason that he would have then been nuked/.
Back to top
deportliberals
Congressman


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

marvinbighead wrote:
If hitler didnt use up his troops attacking russia,(they had a signed peace pact),he then would have had massive armies standing in 1945.That is when the nukes were coming online..It stands to reason that he would have then been nuked/.


So what...we would have used nukes if we had them in 1941....or 1916...or 1812. As usual, you make no sense!

As I said, we first deployed nukes in july 1945...July 16, 1945 to be precise.
Germany had already surrended more than two months before on May 8, 1945...Hitler was dead and gone and never got to see a nuke, although I am sure he is feeling something like nuke heat in the infernal regions where he is at now.

Next country to set off a nuke was the soviets(Russia) some three and a half years later on August 29, 1949. It was lib-leftist america-haters like you(living in my country as U.S. citizens) who stole our nuke techonolgy and gave it to our deadly enemy, the soviets.
Back to top
SVTman
Congressional Page


Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I said, we first deployed nukes in july 1945...July 16, 1945 to be precise.
Germany had already surrended more than two months before on May 8, 1945...Hitler was dead and gone and never got to see a nuke, although I am sure he is feeling something like nuke heat in the infernal regions where he is at now.

Next country to set off a nuke was the soviets(Russia) some three and a half years later on August 29, 1949. It was lib-leftist america-haters like you(living in my country as U.S. citizens) who stole our nuke techonolgy and gave it to our deadly enemy, the soviets.[/quote]

i think what he is trying to say is that if Germany hadn't surendered and all of that by 1945 they would have been nuked when we did develope them. as it was said ideas are a powerful thing but ill bet you didnt know that Hitlers main ideas had taken root in the darwins theory of evolution in that he thought that the arian race was the next best thing and so he set out to show everyone else that. he used the cover of natural seletion to systematicly kill and torture 6,000,000 people. i think that jsut about anyone will really behind someone that says you are better then someone else it is our need to be accepted that brings this on.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index -> History All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Sponsors
Political News
RSS to JavaScript


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group