TheLiberalForums.com Logo.
Click here to view our online shop!

    SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
The time now is Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:46 am
TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index
View unanswered posts

Liberal of the Month
Barack Obama
Barack Obama

Sponsors

Submitted Articles
What is a Liberal?
How Liberalism evolved?

 Search 


RomeForums.com Logo

HippieForums.com Logo

TheXboxBoys.com Logo

Sedo - Buy and Sell Domain Names and Websites etracker® web controlling instead of log file analysis
Opposing community

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index -> US Politics
Author Message
Baker21
Congressional Page


Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:39 am    Post subject: Opposing community Reply with quote

Opposing community states that there are more instances where the innocent persons were made to wait or are detained unnecessarily and unfairly for a long time in search of justice. As the amendment authorizes the denial of bail the conditions are going to get worse. It will be paving tougher ways for those who are not guilty. They will have the relief only if a judge considers the matter positively. The whole scenario will change is the proposal gets accepted and the amendment happens. It will be all on the determination made by a judge that the person committed an act that threatened the safety of the victim or the community. This will be more like making the innocent people get into the sufferance that a convict should face. The judge is made the authority to decide the conditions and the results that can be a part of it. People in Texas oppose such conditional handicapped situations and as such the standard of the proposal has been vehemently rejected. In so many cases it has been found that the innocent people are held guilty and as such are suffering from the punishment that has been allotted to them. The provision of bail makes it little convenient for the convict to get personally into the proceedings in order to prove his innocence. The common statement as made by a daily news correspondent David Disiere, is that the standard does not require proof or any kind of explanation of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt before the person is held in custody. It will under any scene is not going to act more smoothly for all those ho are innocent and are not guilty under any circumstance
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index -> US Politics All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Sponsors
Political News
RSS to JavaScript


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group