More Media Lying To Support Global Warmers

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

Last year this time, we were being clobbered with DIRE WARNINGS 24/7 from the global warmers and their cohorts in the lying liberal media all screaming about a killer hurricane season for '06...WHICH NEVER HAPPENED!!! We had one of the mildest hurricane seasons in decades.

Now...we are having our first subtropical storm just three weeks before the official beginning(June 1) of hurricane season, and we see these same junk science propagandists and their lying cohorts in the media pointing to this early storm as proof of man-made global warming and, oh yes, we're being told again by the same mindless turds to expect a terrible hurricane season in '07. I guess these liars realize that if they kept forecasting a killer hurriciane season-after-season it is bound to happen sometime and that will prove them correct. So much for their version of science!!

Problem with this latest media hysteria about this early subtropical storm is that the real science and the real climatic history shows that the U.S. has experienced 18 EARLY SUBTROPICAL STORMS since 1851.

Ooooooppssss!!!...my...my...how could this important fact not find its way into any of the lying liberal media reports about this year's early storm, Andrea. Also, the media is leaving out the scientific fact that this early storm developed as a result of an unusually cold air pattern, not hot or warm air...ha,ha,ha,ha,ha!! Furthermore, the official hurricane season date of June 1 is a man-made invention that mother nature has ignored many times and will continue do so since puny man cannot tell mother nature when to start the frickin' hurricane season...although liberals seem to think otherwise!

The libs and their junk scientists have another problem. The Director of the Miami Hurricane Center for the last 30 years(Max Mayfield) has said repeatedly that so-called global warming has nothing to do with the intensity of any hurricane season. Hurriance seasons, according to Mr Mayfield, are cyclical, that is, they have a measured 20 to 40 year life cycle where one 20-to-40 year cycle will bring many intense hurricanes and the next cycle will bring a few hurricanes with low intensity.

Libs...let's see your facts that say otherwise??!

rockstar · Congressional Page Joined: 02 Jun 2007 Posts: 10

i agree with you 100%. all of this rubish that the media puts out is rediculous. yes all of the gases and stuff are bad for the environment but we are no where near global warming atleast for another hundred years

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

sodiumhexametaphosphate · Congressional Page Joined: 31 Mar 2007 Posts: 6

TheGlobalSoapBox.com · Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 7:22 am Post subject:

Most of the energy in this country is still created with coal. Why should we switch from gasoline to electricity if we are not actually going green? The biggest reason companies are going green and talking it up is so they can make more money. That is their Green.

So the electric car - now theres an invention whose time hasn't come. Unless of course we get our energy to power the damn things from the wind, solar or even nuclear.

Once the younger generation gets scared into believing the world is getting warmer because mommy and daddy drive a car the big companies have found their next generation of consumers.

Al Gore should be ashamed of himself for spreading worthless science like he is.

Lets keep collecting data for at least say 25% of the earths life before we even start to conclude man has the power to change mother nature. Oh, and what timeframe are we looking at? At least another 1 billion years.

Al baby, call me in the year 1,000,002,008

TGSB