Click here to view our online shop!
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
The time now is Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:46 pm
TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index
View unanswered posts
Liberal of the Month
Barack Obama
Sponsors
Submitted Articles
What is a Liberal?
How Liberalism evolved?
Search
Site
Google
To The 9-11 Conspiracy Nuts
TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index
->
Conspiracy Theories
Author
Message
deportliberals
Congressman
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 9:59 am
Post subject: To The 9-11 Conspiracy Nuts
Why don't you Dr Wood's loons refresh your memories about what exactly happened on 9-11 before you look at any more of her nutty pictures or her insane beam weapon claims:
www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_2001_attacks
Wikipedia provides one of the most accurate & concise accounts of what happened on 9-11 and WHY.
It reminds everyone that there were FOUR hijacked planes although the conspiracy wackos only want to talk about THREE hijacked planes. It also reminds everyone that we found Mohammad Atta's luggage which contained the identification of all 19 hijackers and the fact that they were al qeada.
In addition to pointing out that U.S., German and British intel forces intercepted phone communications between al qeada operatives and Osama bin laden on 9-11 that proved Osama directed this operation, Wikipedia also reminds us that it was during our 2004 elections that Osama bin Laden presented to the world his video tape explaining how he personally planned and directed the 9-11 attacks. So...we have THREE separate nations(U.S., Britian & Germany) that say their 9-11 phone intercepts prove Osama did it, and we have Osama himself on video saying he did it...but...Dr Woods and her wackos say George Bush did it.
Now for the 4th plane...Flight 93 that crashed in Pennsylvania. We have the black box recordings that both officials and family members got to hear which revealed that passengers and crew attempted to retake the cockpit of that plane while the al qeada hijackers were screaming arab jibberish into the mike. How do you Dr Wood idiots explain a perfectly good 757 pitching over and going straight down into the ground while in cruise flight? How do you idiots explain the plane dropping out of altitude to do a 180 and aim for Washington DC. Please tell us why any flight crew would turn off their transponder during any flight???
Any of you wackos care to explain any of these major events involving this
flight???
Now for American flight #77 that hit the pentagon. Go to any of the wacko sites and you'll see their claim that this plane made only a two and a half yard hole in the pentagon. Then look at their own damn pictures and you'll clearly see where the plane took out some 60 feet across splitting in half one entire side of the pentagon. These people will lie right in your face! I drove by the pentagon the next day and the damage was at least 60 feet across. We're also talking about the exact section of the pentagon that had just been reinforced with new construction to upgrade against bomb blasts and that plane still took out a 60 foot section.i
I challenged CB-New York to explain all the eye witness accounts that saw that 757 slam into the pentagon and the best he could come up with is mass hypnosis/hysteria...as in...all of these witnesses didn't see what they saw. CB got that nutty idea from one of the wacko conspiracy web sites. What CB and that idiot Dr Woods don't want you to know is that many of the eye witnesses were professionals in law enforcement, engineering, media and air traffic control. That's right, Sean Boger is an air traffic controller who was at the pentagon when the plane hit...he saw it hit. Also, USA Today reporter Richard Benedetto saw the plane hit the pentagon. There were many others. And, how do the 9-11 conspiracy nuts explain this...all these folks were experiencing mass hallucinations according to the wackos. See, the conspiracy wackos just make up sh*t(any kind of off-hand sh*t) to explain away any fact that dare gets in their way.
Any time CB, Dr Woods or any of the other 9-11 wackjobs want to debate any of the above facts bring it on. I'll go to your website...makes no difference to me. In the meantime CB, why don't you just keep posting more of those ridiculous photos with little arrows pointing at nondescript busted rock & cement where only Dr Woods and her wacko following can see beam weapon damage...everybody else sees only rock & debris.
Here's what wikipedia has to say about you, Dr Woods and the rest of you Bush-haters. "Conspiracy theories are NOT accepted as credible by MAINSTREAM JOURNALISTS, SCIENTISTS AND POLITICAL LEADERS."
Since you people can't produce a single ounce of hard evidence about your phantom beam weapon and since your theory that Bush did it has been so discredited by the intel forces of multiple nations, eye witnessess and Osama bin Laden himself, I think wikipedia's above statement about you wack jobs is dead-on accurate.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:
All Posts
1 Day
7 Days
2 Weeks
1 Month
3 Months
6 Months
1 Year
Oldest First
Newest First
TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index
->
Conspiracy Theories
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page
1
of
1
You
cannot
post new topics in this forum
You
cannot
reply to topics in this forum
You
cannot
edit your posts in this forum
You
cannot
delete your posts in this forum
You
cannot
vote in polls in this forum
Sponsors
Political News
Your browser does not support JavaScript.
Click to read the latest news
.
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group