U.S. Not Fighting Terror In Afghanistan...LIB LIE!!!

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

More proof that libs put their politics ahead of anything...yes even this nation...nothing new here.

A day doesn't go by where we don't hear some lying liberal accuse the Bush administration of wasting time & lives in Iraq by not taking the fight to where the terrorists live...Afghanistan, home to al qeada.

Lying, in liberal land is done by repeating known lies over and over until the lie becomes accepted as truth. This works with the dimwitted, uninformed, the lazy, and the liberal establishment which must have its daily dose of lies in order to exist. For the rest of us, we know better and help others see through the constant lying of the liberal establishment and their cohorts in the liberal media.

Now, I will easily expose this liberal lie with simple truths, facts and unimpeachable sources. First, we were killing al qeada terrorists and taliban terrorists on a massive scale just 26 days after the 9-11 attack. That's right boys and girls, on Oct 7, 2001(just 26 days after 9-11) George Bush and Tony Blair were bombing the hell out of kabul, Afghanistan killing hundreds of Taliban and al qeada driving them out of the city into the mountains.

Within less than a year from the 9-11 attack, George Bush had sent our troops and our airpower into al qeada strongholds in Afghanistan killing hundreds & wounding thousands of al qeada causing the al qeada strongholds at Tora Bora, Kandahar & Kunduz to fall to our troops within months. Where do you stupid liberals think the 900 Gitmo detainees came from?? They were scrapped off the Tora Bora & Kandahar battlefields trying to kill our troops. Yes...this is the Gitmo al qeada scum that you libs want to give U.S. Constitutional rights to just to stab Geroge Bush in the back politically and to make yourselves feel good.

What were the libs here in the U.S. doing while Bush & Blaire were killing al qeada terrorists in Afghanistan??? Our enlightened libs were out protesting in our streets in San Francisco, Washington DC, LA and elsewhere against the mean ole U.S bombings in Afghanistan...a number of college campus' joined this effort as well. The lib media protected these lib protests by deliberatly NOT COVERING the protests or providing only scant coverage of these lib protesters because the lib media knew that america was NOT in the mood to hear or see this anti-war crap from liberal-land.

Next, George Bush gave orders for the U.S. 10th Mountain Division(12,000 troops) to go to Afghanistan where they stayed until just a couple of months ago when they were relieved by NATO forces. That's right, this kick-ass division of 12,000 troops has been tracking, killing & gutting al qeada scum for almost five years now...BUT...the lying liberals and their lying cohorts in the lying media tell YOU Bush isn't doing anything about the so-called real terrorist in Afghanistan. Here's a couple of links at wikipedia to bring you up to date on the FACTS!!!

www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan(2001%E2%.80%.93present)

www.en.wikipedia.org.wiki/10th_Mountain_Division_(United_States)

If you have any character, honor or code operating in you life, there's got to come a time when you're going to get sick and tired of being lied to by today's liberal establishment and their lying supporters in the mainstream media. Next time you hear some loud mouth lib spew the totally false claim that the Bush administration is not fighting terrorism or that we should be fighting terrorism in Afghanistan, send that moron to the closet 10th Mountain Division troop you can find for a good ass-kicking. It is an outrageous insult to the thousands of 10th Division troops who have served in Afghanistan over the last five years to say that they've been doing nothing to kill al qeada. Liberals are the lowest form of life known to man!!!!

DavidNYC · Congressional Page Joined: 05 Jan 2007 Posts: 28

My problem regarding the "War on Terror" is that while there are 12,000 troops in Afghanistan, there were at one point 150,000 troops in Iraq. The countries are almost the same size (with afghanistan being slightly LARGER). We know for a fact that Osama Bin Laden was behind the terror attacks of not only 9/11 but numerous other US attacks. So how is it an aging islamic fundamentalist on dialysis can escape the US, but a dictator hiding in a camoflaged hole can get captured so quickly? Simply put, the troop numbers. If we made Afghanistan a priority, we would have captured more if not all of the terror networks top operatives. THAT is my problem.

James Rottnek · Mayor's Aide Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 65

Leaders in Afghanistan (military ones) have said that if not for Iraq, we could have finished with Afghanistan by now. Also, you say that Libs let their parties get in the way of everything else? You are a Republican, you have no right to say that.

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

[quote="James Rottnek"]Leaders in Afghanistan (military ones) have said that if not for Iraq, we could have finished with Afghanistan by now.

Another lie!! Show me your source for this statement?

James Rottnek · Mayor's Aide Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 65

I am sorry for calling you a Republican, most conservatives are. I apologize. However, almost all political parties live for their parties. The main politicians that do not are, in my mind, John McCain and Barrack Obama.
As for the first part, that was in an interview on C-SPAN.

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

Anonymous Mind · Mayor's Aide Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 56 Location: US

Anonymous Mind · Mayor's Aide Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 56 Location: US

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

THR · Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:04 am Post subject:

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704