We Never Went to the Moon

Scott · Mayor's Aide Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 53

These videos argue that we never went to the moon.

http://video.google.es/videoplay?docid=4135126565081757736

http://video.google.es/videoplay?docid=-7251089776146839385
http://video.google.es/videoplay?docid=8585273531105072202

http://video.google.es/videoplay?docid=7284336491671901968

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILnDZ5yl7D0&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfOMPeFk2Lk

http://video.google.es/videoplay?docid=740357581314190967

http://www.erichufschmid.net/Interview-with-Bart-Sibrel.html
http://video.google.es/videoplay?docid=-73731341583788062

http://www.thule.org/brains/moon.rm

The people who made them did make a few mistakes but I think they prove we never went to the moon.

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha...that this childish nonsense is still being offered shows just what a sad state the human condition really is...and the level of immaturity that operates in the world of conspiracy nuts.

The Soviet Union, our deadly enemy and fierce competitor in the race to the moon at that time(1969), will be glad to confirm for all you america-haters that they tracked us all the way to the moon and back. If any nation, power or ideology on this planet had the incentive and overwhelming desire to say to the world that the U.S. never went to the moon and never landed on the moon, it would be the Soviet Union...who was left with mud on their face over this technological accomplishment.

The comunist Soviet Union acknowleged before the world that we went to the moon and gave us their congratulations; america knows we went to the moon and so does the rest of the world. Only the wacko fringe element is still trying to deny this fantastic accomplishment and their reason for such insanity is NO secret...just talk to any of them...they hate this nation with passion.

lookwhere33 · Congressional Page Joined: 25 Mar 2007 Posts: 3

There is enough evidence and what will you make of the footprint? The thing is that program will also have to be open for the public, for those who have the money so that there will be many people talking about it.

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

leftseater/rightwinger · Congressional Page Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 7

If the US Gov were going to lie about landing somewhere, why on earth would they pick the moon?

Why not big, attractive planets like Saturn or Jupiter?

I am constantly amazed at the stupidity of some people. Rolling Eyes

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

Hey, Scot...don't run away...still waiting for you to tell us which of the SIX MOON LANDINGS was a fake???? Like to see your evidence?? Still want to know how some 10,000 NASA employees have kept quiet about all this fakery for the last 38 years.

Please tell us how each of the six moon launches that the entire world watched on real-time video(not delayed time) was faked? Like to see your evidence.

You see, when you announce a moon launch you have the entire world watching. Media from all over the world comes to the U.S. to capture the event on video. You have thousands of engineers and scientists involved with every small step of the preparations, launch, landing and recovery. Scientists and engineers from other nations with radar tracking confirmed the lunar modules arrivals and landings on the moon.

Oh...and since we did six moon landings are you saying that all six (different) apollo crrews were in on the fakery and never said a word to anyone???

Man...this has got to be most sophisticated video fakery man has ever produced...unfortunately for you and your idiot friends...we didn't have such capability 38 years ago. Thirty eigth years ago most people owned only black and white TVs because color TV(as you I a know today) hadn't even been invented and there was no such thing as a color signal.

Captain Kirk and Star Trek had just started airing in black and white on our TVs. Computer video games didn't exist. Computers were still using vacum tubes instead of mirco-processors. GPS didn't exist! There were no emission control devices on any cars. FM radio had just been made commercially available for only a few years. Personal computers didn't hit the public market until some 16 years after the first moon landing.

There was no way NASA could have technically video-faked any of the six moon landings with the rest of the technical world watching our every move.

Go waste your time on something else besides trying to denounce one of this country's greatest achivements.

Scott...I almost forgot...did you even bother to listen to the introduction to your JemWork, LLC link. The narrator clearly says upfront that everything presented is THEORY ONLY. Also, you might want to check out your JemWork LLC link. They do stuff like "Encounters with Angles" and "Divine Messages." A Real creditible source. How old are you???

I see another link of yours to Choi Style productions. Are you aware that they are an hispanic production group who has absolutely nothing good to say about this country? If they're not presenting anti-Bush propaganda, then they produce stuff on american racism. Of course, in the hispanic world there is no racism, right.

Your sources are the typical lunatic fringe operations that are plaguing the internet with wacko anti-american tales, presenting insane theories as fact and sucking in the really stupid, uninformed people who make up the majority of today's internet users. No one embraces lies and raw propaganda more than the uninformed and the ignorant. Look no further than CB_Brooklyn for a prime example of what I'm talking about. He cannot defend ONE of his idiot postings from fact-filled scrunity. Just today he said that "speed"/"velocity" is not a factor in penetrating a hard surface.
Yet...basic physics says the opposite and years of clinical testing has proved it. CB_Brooklyn is one of the truly uninformed who frequents these childishly insane hate-america web sites and then regurgitates that crap at other sites. Get a Clue!!!

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

Still waiting to here from you, Scott! I know you've seen my responses!

Here's why you won't dare stick your face in this thread again! YOU had no clue(NONE) that this nation had made a total of NINE trips to the moon and had landed on the moon SIX times. YOU thought there had been only ONE moon landing.

You didn't do your homework!!! If you had done just 20 minutes/ 30 minutes of research, you would have quickly realized the level of pure bullsh*t coming from all those idiot links you provided.

Let this be a lesson to anyone who frequents these wacko conspiracy web sites. DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING UNTIL YOU'VE DONE YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!! And, one other thing, all of these wacko conspiracy web sites NEVER HAVE ANY EVIDNECE!!! They use tricks like PHOTOGRAPHS...claiming certain OBJECTS in these blurred photographs to be evidence supporting their insane theories...but...they NEVER provide real evidence!!! OR...they get some totally obscure so-called specialists/scientists to make wild unprovable statements using words like "may/maybe" or "theory" to protect themselves from law suits.

WHENEVER you hear the words 'theory" or "may/ maybe" or "possible" or "might" A BIG RED LIGHT SHOULD GO OFF IN YOUR HEAD!!! People use these words to protect themselves from being sued by legitimate experts whose works/achievements are usually being maligned by these nutjobs.

What's next, Scott?? Since you think we didn't land on the moon, I guess all the Mars & Venus surface photos sent back by our spacecraft are fake also, right?

Scott · Mayor's Aide Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 53

I've seen all of these videos and I've read a lot of the pro-Apollo websites. I think the websites are damage-control by the government. There are some things in those videos that seem irrefutible.

In "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" at the 30 minute 38 second mark it is alleged that slow motion is used to simulate moon gravity.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3-QIlsWhaw

Look at the movements in this clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQTNLaUE&mode=related&search=

I can see a difference in the body movements. In the earlier missions "Slow motion" was used. In the later missions "Wire supports", or a combinations of slow-motion and wire supports were used. The body movements are noticeably different.
Also, look at the size of the reflection of the sun in the astronaut's visor in the first scene of the video clip. It looks like the reflection of a big light--not the sun.
Look at the size of the reflection of the sun in the visor of the shuttle astronaut.
http://a52.g.akamaitech.net/f/52/827/1d/www.space.com/images/ig_65.13_sts51i_ox.jpg

The reflection of the sun in the Apollo astronaut's visor is bigger--too big a difference to be explained by the difference in curvature in the two visors.

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

Scott · Mayor's Aide Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 53

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

Scott · Mayor's Aide Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 53

Why don't you analyze the evidence I posted in the ninth post of this thread?

Do you think that when footage is played at double speed astronauts will look like they are walking in earth gravity?

deportliberals · Congressman Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 704

Scott · Mayor's Aide Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 53