When does arguing get out of hand?

Click here to view our online shop!

Memberlist

Profile

The time now is Thu Dec 04, 2008 1:48 pm
TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index

View unanswered posts

Liberal of the Month
Barack Obama

Sponsors

Submitted Articles
What is a Liberal? How Liberalism evolved?

When does arguing get out of hand?
Goto page Previous 1, 2

TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index -> Why I created the forum

Author

Message

deportliberals
Congressman

Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 704

Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:13 am Post subject:

Pibber wrote:

You are apparently not well versed in military history.

Have I read any "art of war books"?? No, nor have I ever claimed any expertise in the science of war. However, I really doubt that YOU know the working end of the L.A.W. or could belt load and/or change the barrel out of a hot M60 during a firefight or could set up claymores or could properly sight a weapon for windage and elevation.

Quote:

My mistake. Like I said; any subject you like.

I've already offered a couple of topics above...why are you still asking for a topic???

Quote:

Although I really hope such a debate doesn't devolve into a pissing contest of conflicting statistics and psuedo-facts.

Debate without supporting facts and legitimate sources is nothing but hot air. There are legitimate statistics for all topics. If you can't bring facts, stats and sources to support your position then don't waste my time. Even high school debates require facts and stats. Only in the world of liberalism are facts, truth, data rejected for opinion, lies, rumor & ineundos. If that's all you've got then go jabber with some lib...it's what they do.

Quote:

I like hear people explain why they believe things. I like to explore the premise of every question. Not just accept it at face value. I hope you can debate on those terms.

I've never heard of a debate that "explains" or "explores" any topic without facts, data & sources being front, center and constant. If you're looking for a bar room jaw jakin' session, you've come to the wrong place.
I do hard facts, hard history, direct quotes and sources.

Pibber
Congressional Page

Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 27
Location: USA

Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:12 pm Post subject:

deportliberals wrote:

Pibber wrote:

You are apparently not well versed in military history.

Quote:

My mistake. Like I said; any subject you like.

I've already offered a couple of topics above...why are you still asking for a topic???

Quote:

Although I really hope such a debate doesn't devolve into a pissing contest of conflicting statistics and psuedo-facts.

Quote:

I like hear people explain why they believe things. I like to explore the premise of every question. Not just accept it at face value. I hope you can debate on those terms.

Hard facts? Hard history? Quotes and sources? You don't honestly do any of those things. You pose obvious set up questions. You try to establish false context based on fallacious assumptions. You define reality to fit your narrow view. I wonder what makes a "hard fact", as oppossed to a fact that you would typically dismiss. Probably one that fits what ever opinion you already have. Can't be getting those facts from the dreaded liberal media. Hard to tell when you are stating "facts" because they are so obscured with agenda.

Pibber
Congressional Page

Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 27
Location: USA

Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:51 am Post subject:

Oh by the way. Not only do I know the woking end of an M60 and a LAW (not to mention the M79, .50 M-2, M-16, M-14, M-1, .45 1911); I know a little bit about the receiving end too. Should you have any technical questions regarding the operation or disassembly/reassembly of any of those weapons, feel free to contact me.

mykcob4
Mayor's Aide

Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 50
Location: dallas

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 6:59 am Post subject:

deportliberals wrote:

shinningstar wrote:

Well, I respect all your point of view. Infact, I'm not idealistic but realistic. Honestly, I hate to follow rules. It's just sometimes I don't have any choice.

It is nothing but pure, raw political correctness to say that you "respect" all opinions. Opinions without facts or some basis in fact are nothing but rumors, lies or inuendos and should not command anyone's respect.

Respect is something that must be "earned" and this "fact" has been lost on our politically correct asinine culture. You should NOT respect all opinions unless you want to place yourself in the lowly position of respecting "lies, rumors, gossip and jabber-jaw bullsh*t!!!

Save your "respect" for those opinions that are truly worthy of respect...be very selective with your respect...opinions that are built upon truths, facts, research and reasoned assessments are the earners of respect. Everything else is pure mindless crap and totally worthless.

You are a moron. It is common decency to respect others, but you wouldn't know that because you are a selfish punk that has no morals and no ethics!

Display posts from previous:

	TheLiberalForums.com Forum Index -> Why I created the forum	All times are GMT - 8 Hours Goto page Previous 1, 2
Page 2 of 2


	You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Sponsors

Political News